These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

According to the passage, what did the Supreme Court of India emphasize as a crucial part of a healthy democracy?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

What can be inferred about the Supreme Court's stance on free speech?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

Choose the correct pair of antonym and synonym for the word "crucial" as used in the passage

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

What does "this whole thing" refer to in the passage?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

What is the main theme of the passage?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

What is the author's tone and purpose in writing the passage?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

How does the passage structure its argument regarding the importance of dissent in a democracy?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

Based on the passage, what might be a consequence of silencing dissent in a democracy?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

How does the passage suggest society should respond to the Supreme Court's ruling on dissent?

These days, democracies are constantly on edge, caught between the power of the government and the freedoms of its people. That's why it's important, even crucial, that the Supreme Court of India just came out strong in favour of dissent being a key part of a healthy democracy. The Court basically said, "Hey, criticizing the government isn't always a crime!" This is a big deal, especially now when people get accused of treason and threats to national security just for disagreeing. It's like they're trying to shut everyone up!

The Supreme Court basically told the police to get a better handle on what free speech really means (it's right there in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, by the way). They need to learn the difference between someone just voicing their opinion and someone trying to stir up trouble. This isn't just about paperwork, it's about getting back to the basics of democracy at a time when it's hard to tell the difference between saying what you think and being a criminal.

This whole thing started because a professor in Kolhapur got in trouble with the law for speaking his mind about some hot-button political issues. The Supreme Court stepped in and threw the charges out, showing they're serious about protecting free speech. This isn't the first time they've done this, either. They've been setting the boundaries for what you can and can't say under the Constitution for a while now.

One of the Supreme Court justices, Justice BV Nagarathna, even said that dissent is super important for making our government better. It helps us come up with new ideas and improve the way things are run. This fancy legal talk just means that different viewpoints are good for everyone, they help us have better discussions and make better policies.

But this isn't just about the police. There's a bigger problem in society where people try to shut down anyone who disagrees with them, all in the name of keeping everyone happy or protecting the country's feelings. Silencing dissent doesn't just make for boring conversations, it turns democracy into a one-sided echo chamber where nobody questions anything. That's bad news.

The Supreme Court is basically saying, "Let's all be smarter about this dissent thing, and follow the Constitution!" We need a complete overhaul, from the judges all the way down to the people on the street. We need to create a space where everyone feels comfortable having a reasonable debate and sharing their thoughts, no matter how different they are. This isn't just about the law, it's about bringing back the spirit of the "argumentative Indian" – someone who loves a good discussion and wants to make sure everyone gets a say in our democracy.

What would be an appropriate title for the passage?