Attempt Reading Comprehension Quiz Based on 22nd March Editorial

Created on

Attempt Reading Comprehension Quiz Based on 22nd Mar Editorial

Please fill out the form to help us personalize your experience and provide you with relevant quizzes.

The passage highlights the critical need for a concerted effort to understand and address disparities in dialysis care through the establishment of national benchmarks and improving care processes, especially in rural areas. This option best captures the essence and main conclusion of the passage.

1 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

Which statement best summarizes the passage?

2 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

What real-world impact might the establishment of national benchmarks for dialysis outcomes have?

3 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

According to the passage, what is crucial for improving dialysis care in India?

4 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

Which of the following best describes the logical structure of the argument in the passage?

5 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

What is the author's tone in discussing the disparities in dialysis care?

6 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

In the passage, the pronoun "we" in "we hope to mitigate the disparities" refers to whom?

7 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

In the context of the passage, what does "arduous" most likely mean?

8 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

What can be inferred about the disparities in survival rates among dialysis patients in India?

9 / 9

India's struggle with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached a critical juncture, as the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis continues to surge. The establishment of the National Dialysis Service in 2016, aimed at improving access to dialysis services, marks a significant step towards addressing this growing challenge. Despite these efforts, the journey to ensure equitable and quality dialysis care across the nation is far from over. Recent findings suggest a dire need for a national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients, highlighting the disparities in patient outcomes, particularly between urban and rural centres. A comprehensive study, involving over 23,600 patients within the NephroPlus network, reveals alarming disparities in survival rates, with mortality rates in rural centres being significantly higher than those in urban counterparts. This discrepancy underscores the broader issue of healthcare access and quality in rural India, where infrastructural and staffing challenges exacerbate the plight of patients.

The establishment of a national benchmark for dialysis outcomes is a commendable first step, but it is just the beginning of a long and arduous journey towards ensuring that every patient, irrespective of their geographic or socioeconomic status, receives the highest standard of care. The variability in survival rates across different centres calls for a concerted effort to standardize care processes and improve staffing and infrastructural facilities, especially in rural areas.The path forward necessitates a collaborative quality improvement system that spans the breadth of the country. Only through a concerted effort to understand and address the multilevel effects of centre- and patient-level characteristics on survival outcomes can we hope to mitigate the disparities that currently mar the landscape of dialysis care in India. As we stand on the brink of a potential healthcare crisis due to the increasing demand for dialysis, the time to act is now. Establishing national standards and benchmarks for dialysis outcomes is not just an administrative necessity but a moral imperative to ensure that the right to health and life is upheld for all patients battling ESRD in India.

When was the National Dialysis Service established in India?

Your score is

The average score is 40%

0%

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. AACHAL

    THANK YOU SU MUCH SIR , 9/9

  2. Neha Kumari

    4/9
    Thankyou sir ❤️😊

  3. Chetna Rathore

    5/9

Leave a Reply