In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.10 Which of the following best summarizes the passage?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.9 The passage implies that the Supreme Court's proposal could have what effect on Indian politics?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.8 According to the author, what is a significant risk of the current political dynamics in India?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.7 Which of the following best describes the structure of the argument in the passage?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.6 What is the author's tone regarding the Supreme Court's proposal?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.5 What is the central theme of the passage?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.4 In the passage, what does 'this initiative' refer to?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.3 In the context of the passage, what does 'clarion call' most likely mean?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.2 What can be inferred about the current state of politics in India from the passage?

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

In a remarkable move, the Supreme Court of India has proposed a pan-India mechanism to discern if political vendetta fuels the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and retaliatory arrests by opposition-ruled states. This initiative, piloted in Tamil Nadu, emerges as a critical juncture in the nation's ongoing struggle with the politicization of federal agencies and the integrity of its federal structure. This decision is a response to the increasing tit-for-tat between the central agencies and state governments, a dynamic that risks destabilizing India's federal equilibrium. The situation in Tamil Nadu, where the state government is accused of non-cooperation with the ED, and the ED, in turn, is alleged to be a tool for targeting non-BJP ruled states, exemplifies this fraught relationship. This situation casts a long shadow over India's governance, jeopardizing the essential balance between state autonomy and central authority. The Supreme Court’s concern highlights a critical question: What happens to India's democratic fabric and federal structure if this cycle of perceived vindictiveness continues unabated?

The consequences of this vendetta-driven governance are manifold. It undermines public trust in institutions, hampers effective governance, and could potentially lead to a governance paralysis. More importantly, it signals a dangerous trend where political rivalry overshadows national interests and administrative integrity.

The Supreme Court’s proposal, therefore, is not just a legal intervention but a clarion call for sanity and balance in politics. The tone is not accusatory but concerned, urging a restoration of faith in the system and a call for cooperative federalism. The proposed mechanism in Tamil Nadu should serve as a test case for a larger, more comprehensive solution to the issue. It is imperative for both the central and state governments to rise above partisan politics and embrace this initiative. The Supreme Court’s intervention must catalyze a systemic change, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and the fight against corruption are not marred by political vendettas. This mechanism, once successful, should be implemented nationwide, safeguarding the essence of India’s federal structure and restoring the sanctity of its democratic institutions. The time to act is now, for the sake of India's democratic integrity and the trust of its citizens in the system.

Q.1 What is the primary purpose of the proposed mechanism by the Supreme Court of India?