In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.7 Which of the following best summarizes the passage?

In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.6 What is the author's tone in discussing the judicial reforms?

In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.5 What is the central theme of the passage?

In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.4 In the passage, 'these changes' in the last paragraph refers to what?

In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.3 In the passage, the word 'paradigm' most likely means:

In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.2 What can be inferred about the current state of the Indian legal system from Chief Justice Chandrachud's proposals?

In a significant discourse marking the Supreme Court's diamond jubilee, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has ignited a vital conversation on judicial reforms in India. His proposal to reevaluate long vacations and advocate a culture of professionalism within the judiciary resonates with the urgent need for an efficient legal system. The essence of his address goes beyond administrative restructuring; it touches the very fabric of judicial accessibility and equity. Justice Chandrachud's focus on curtailing lengthy vacations is not merely a shift in tradition but a strategic move towards reducing the extensive backlog of cases. This reform, while respecting the well-being of legal practitioners, could substantially hasten the wheels of justice. Equally crucial is his call to replace the prevalent 'adjournment culture' with professionalism. This change promises swifter legal proceedings and a more decisive judicial process, directly impacting the common citizen's access to timely justice.The Chief Justice's emphasis on creating a level playing field for first-generation lawyers is a commendable step towards inclusivity. It recognizes the evolving demographics in the legal profession, moving away from its traditional elitist confines. Such inclusivity not only enriches the legal profession with diverse perspectives but also strengthens the judiciary's role as a representative institution.

Technology's integration, accelerated by the pandemic, has brought a paradigm shift in judicial proceedings. The substantial strides made in digital hearings and record-keeping enhance transparency and accessibility, reflecting the judiciary's adaptability to contemporary challenges.Prime Minister Modi's commitment to augmenting the judicial infrastructure aligns well with these reformative visions. It signifies a collaborative effort between the judiciary and the government, essential for a holistic overhaul of the legal system.However, the path to reform is layered and demands continuous engagement from all judiciary stakeholders. While infrastructural and procedural enhancements are pivotal, the ethos of justice—fairness, impartiality, and accessibility—must remain at the core of these changes.As India's Supreme Court embarks on its next decade, it stands at a crossroads. The direction chosen now will not only define its future trajectory but also significantly influence the fabric of Indian democracy. This juncture, thus, is not just a celebration of the past but a clarion call for a future where justice is not only upheld but is made more accessible, equitable, and in tune with the times.

Q.1 What significant event does the passage mention Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud spoke at?