In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.1 Which ship did INS Sumitra intercept in the Gulf of Aden?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.2 What can be inferred about the recent trends in piracy in the Arabian Sea?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.3 In the context of the passage, what does the term 'exacerbated' most likely mean?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.4 In the passage, what does 'it' refer to in "it poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers"?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.5 What is the main theme of the passage?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.6 What is the author's tone in discussing India's role in maritime security?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.7 Which of the following best describes the structure of the argument in the passage?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.8 According to the author, what is a critical aspect of India's maritime operations?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.9 How does piracy in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden directly affect India?

In a world increasingly connected by the seas, piracy remains a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in maritime security. The recent interception by INS Sumitra of a hijacked Iranian fishing vessel, FV Iman, in the Gulf of Aden, not only underscores the persistent threat of piracy but also highlights the pivotal role of the Indian Navy in ensuring regional maritime safety. The backdrop to this incident is telling: piracy, which seemed to be receding post-2010, has witnessed a resurgence in the Arabian Sea and surrounding areas. The situation is exacerbated by the Houthi drone and missile attacks on commercial shipping, creating a complex security environment. The hijacking of the m.v. Ruen and the attempted hijacking of the Lila Norfolk, with Indian nationals among the crew, brought this threat closer to India's interests. India's response has been swift and decisive. The Indian Navy's enhanced surveillance and increased deployment of warships in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden reflect a proactive approach to maritime security. Such actions serve dual purposes: safeguarding international shipping lanes vital for global trade and protecting Indian interests in these waters.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching. Piracy disrupts international trade, which is the lifeline of the global economy. It poses significant risks to the lives and safety of seafarers, often leading to humanitarian crises. For India, ensuring the security of the sea lanes in the Indian Ocean Region is not just a matter of economic interest but also of national security, given its strategic location and extensive coastline. However, India's actions have broader consequences. By taking a leading role in maritime security operations, India is asserting its position as a responsible maritime power. This is crucial in a region where power dynamics are constantly shifting, and where India's role as a stabilizing force is increasingly recognized and appreciated. The tone of these operations – firm yet measured, respecting international laws and norms – is also significant. It reflects India's commitment to upholding the rule of law at sea, an essential component of its broader foreign policy objectives. The actions of INS Sumitra and the broader Indian Navy efforts are commendable. They signify a proactive stance against a resurgent threat, demonstrating India's capability and willingness to assume greater responsibilities for regional security. However, the fight against piracy requires collaborative international efforts. India, while taking the lead, must continue to engage with global partners to develop comprehensive strategies to address this persistent challenge. The call to action is clear: maritime security is a shared responsibility, and only through collective efforts can we ensure the safety and security of the seas that connect us all.

Q.10 Which statement best summarizes the passage?