In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.1 For what offense was former Prime Minister Imran Khan sentenced to 10 years in prison?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.2 What can be inferred about the nature of Imran Khan's conviction?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.3 In the context of the passage, what does the phrase "sends shivers through the corridors of power" most likely mean?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.4 In the passage, the pronoun 'it' in the phrase "it signals a troubling crackdown on dissent" refers to what?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.5 What is the main theme of the passage?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.6 What is the author's tone in discussing the verdict against Imran Khan?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.7 How is the argument in the passage primarily structured?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.8 The author likely believes that:

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.9 What could be a real-world implication of the verdict against Imran Khan for neighboring India?

In a verdict that sends shivers through the corridors of power and public life in Pakistan, a court has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 10 years for revealing state secrets. This ruling, arriving just ahead of the February 8 parliamentary elections, is not just a blow to Khan, who is already serving a graft-related sentence, but also to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. The context of this case, popularly known as the Cipher case, points to a disturbing trend in Pakistani politics. Khan, a charismatic leader whose journey from cricket stardom to the pinnacle of political power captured imaginations globally, now finds himself ensnared in a legal web that many view as politically motivated. His conviction for waving a classified document at a rally, allegedly exposing a U.S. conspiracy against his government, is emblematic of the tense civil-military relations that have long defined Pakistani politics. The implications of this verdict are profound, especially for neighboring India. The political turmoil in Pakistan, marked by Khan’s dramatic downfall, could lead to instability that spills over borders. India must be wary of the potential for increased cross-border tensions and the unpredictable shifts in Pakistan's foreign policy that a power vacuum could provoke.

The consequences of this verdict extend beyond immediate political fallout. It signals a troubling crackdown on dissent and raises questions about the fairness of the upcoming elections. The sidelining of Khan and his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), coupled with allegations of pre-poll rigging and the suppression of political freedoms, casts a long shadow over the democratic processes in Pakistan.The imprisonment of a former Prime Minister on charges that many believe to be politically charged undermines the credibility of Pakistan’s judicial system and its democratic institutions. It reinforces the perception of a country where political vendettas overshadow the rule of law. This verdict against Imran Khan is not just a legal judgment; it is a political statement with far-reaching implications for the region. It calls for a sober reflection on the state of democracy and justice in Pakistan. The international community, especially neighboring countries like India, must remain vigilant and advocate for a fair and transparent political process in Pakistan. The call to action here is clear: to support democratic norms and the rule of law in a region where stability and peace are already fragile commodities.

Q.10 Which statement best summarizes the passage?